2002-05-16                     House Journal                      Page 3836
HB 389                                                                                            
Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                     
House consider the Senate message (page 3830) on the following at                                   
this time:                                                                                          
                                                                                                    
    CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 389(CRA)                                                                  
    "An Act eliminating the delayed repeal of a provision authorizing                               
    an exemption from and deferral of municipal property taxes on                                   
    certain types of deteriorated property; and providing for an                                    
    effective date."                                                                                
                                                                                                    
and                                                                                                 
                                                                                                    
    SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 389(RLS)                                                    
    "An Act changing the date of repeal of a provision authorizing an                               
    exemption from and deferral of municipal property taxes on                                      
    certain types of deteriorated property; and providing for an                                    
    effective date."                                                                                
                                                                                                    
    (SCR 38 - title change resolution)                                                              

2002-05-16                     House Journal                      Page 3837
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                        
                                                                                                    
Representative James moved that the House concur in the Senate                                      
amendment to CSHB 389(CRA), thus adopting SCS CSHB 389(RLS),                                        
and recommended that the members vote yes.                                                          
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                          
amendment to CSHB 389(CRA)?"  The roll was taken with the                                           
following result:                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 389(RLS)                                                                                   
Concur                                                                                              
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  40   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft,                                
Davies, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes,                                   
Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott,                                    
Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Mulder,                                            
Murkowski, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker,                                       
Williams, Wilson                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                  
SCS CSHB 389(RLS).                                                                                  
                                                                                                    
Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                     
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                                                    
The Chief Clerk was instructed to so notify the Senate.                                             
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 389(RLS) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.